rebuilding-renewing-transforming-school-systems
  • Joint Statement
  • Global Educator Organizations
    • AASA (SD Admin)
    • ASCD & ISTE (senior ldrs)
    • CASSA (SD Admin)
    • Education Support & Cultural Workers
    • ISNA (International School Nurses Association)
    • IAC (Counselors)
    • ICP (Principals)
    • ISPA (Psychologists)
    • GNDE (Deans of Ed)
  • Endorse Statement, Edit Paper & More
  • Summaries on Transforming School & Other Systems
    • Apply/Nominate Writers of summary
    • Influencers
    • Actors & Employees
    • Contextual Mediators
    • System Elements
    • Steps & Processes in Systems Change
  • Organizations & Individuals Supporting Statement
  • UN / Global Initiatives on Transforming Schools
  • Blog: Ed News & Activities on Systems Transformation
  • Webinars
  • Contact
Summaries of Key Steps & Processes in Changing Systems 
This page introduces a list of strategic, practical  and formal steps  and proccessesthat should be considered when school and other systems are being rebuilt, renewed or transformed. There are several steps that can lead to significant and sustainable change. We have created these detailed lists because we think it is easier to work on small, specific changes rather than being faced with broad, general statements about transforming systems. Each of the underlined steps in the text below and listed in the right hand column will be described in a brief summary that explains its importance  as well as providing evidence and examples. If you would like to be involved, in this process, please  contact [email protected].
Key Steps & Proccesses in Systems Change
The steps in changing systems can be grouped under continuous improvement and transformative strategies.  (Setiawan, 2020;  McCall, 1982, Winthrop & Sengeh, 2022). Both require planned, incremental changes supported by employees at all levels. The UN Guidance Note for translating the TES national commitments into action describes several small scale steps that countries can take to improve their systems. (e.g. using existing meetings & mechanisms). The joint statement from educator organizations has identified transfornmative steps such as education reform commissions & external system reviews. Each transformative step can be broken down into smaller units (e.g. effective education reform commissions) 

These steps and processes can be guided by several theories of change including diffusion of innovations (Rogers, 1995), the learning organization (Senge, 1990), total quality management (Demings). Implementing & sustaining   school-based and linked intersectoral  frameworks such as those suggested by FRESH Partners, 2018 are essential if other sectors are to be engaged in transforming schools and their own systems.
​
Steps in Systems Change
Click on the active web links below to view the summaries prepared for this initiative:

​

Education and other Ministries in countries should consider these steps and processes:

a)  Seek and maintain consensus on fundamental principles around which schools systems, working with other systems & multi-year priorities These can include:
-a balance among purposes of schooling, (learning to learn, to do, to be and to live together)
- inclusion of all children in schooling and in regular classes or schools
= providing several supports for equitable opportunities
- monitoring to ensure equitable results are achieved to marginalized groups
- student centered and serving the needs of the whole child
- wide breadth of learning opportunities for all
- strengthening inter-ministry coordination (IC)
- building whole government approaches (WoG) on broad child/youth needs,
- engaging local communities & youth
- investing in employee development

b) Create wider and deeper ownership of the commitment to transformation by
  1. Conducting a post-TES or preliminary consultation with stakeholders prior to launching a formal reform initiative. This should include ministries/agencies (e.g. ministries of finance, health, social protection, economic development, planning, labour and environment), sub-national entities, youth and civil society organizations
  2. Securing the involvement and  contributions of other ministries and agencies and reaching out to local actors. 
  3. Ensuring that these Inter-ministry talks explain the difference of using the school "as a hub or nexus" for achieving other ministry priorities & not just securing more resources for education. Strengthening whole-of-government and inter-ministerial discussions on the role of education in economic and social transformation and the school as a hub for multi-sector program delivery
  4. Identifying and planning for key moments and forums at national, within and beyond the education landscape, where the transformation agenda could be at the centre of the policy and financing discussion
  5. Mapping the wider stakeholder network and
    a review the national socio-economic development plan to discuss how to integrate education transformation can support that plan through inter-ministerial collaboration
  6. using inter-ministerial meetings to create commitment to the transformation agenda in education (and other ministries.
  7. Creating a website or a platform where all information on the transformation process is published
  1. c) Move from commitment to policy and planning to integrate the transformation agenda into existing national policies and plans through:

c) Move from commitment to policy and planning to integrate the transformation agenda into existing national policies and plans through:

d) Move from policy and plan to action by
  1. holding regular meetings to share progress reports with administration and school staff or their representatives
  2. identifying and planning how to alleviate major bottle necks (critical transition points) with stakeholders
  3. guiding and strengthening supervisors and local administrators ability to manage change, create consensus
  4. supporting principals, teachers and educators as “action researchers” whose insights can contribute to designing innovative transformation strategies
  5. exploring the potential of successful local initiatives to become system-wide reform strategies
e) Account for commitments, action, and results by:
  1. developing an intersectoral (inter-ministry, inter-agency, inter-professional) monitoring matrix which identifies responsibility for follow-up action and resources/competencies/assets needed
  2. using existing mechanisms at national and sub-national levels (for instance, joint sector reviews; mid-term and final evaluations of plans; annual humanitarian assessments and household surveys; the SDG4 monitoring process) for monitoring the commitments
  3. promoting the use of qualitative studies by country-level researchers
  4. using existing global mechanisms, such as the Voluntary National Reports (VNR) to the UN High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF), periodic review of normative instruments, and the Global Education Meeting (GEM) convened by UNESCO, as milestones/modalities to share their progress
f) Establishing and/or acting upon the recommendations of an education reform commission into school and other systems that work within or with schools

g) Establishing and mandating a formal stakeholder advisory committee to monitor the inquiry and contribute to its report

h) Commissioning reviews of data, reports, studies and surveys on child/youth safety, health & development as well as student retention and academic achievement, access & participation in early childhood, schooling and post-secondary education/training and youth employment - to feed into the inquiry and report

i) Conducting specific consultations with representatives and surveys of all relevant personnel including teachers, education support professionals, principals, senior and mid-level managers, facilities, transportation, technology and student services managers, counsellors, psychologists, nurses, social workers, relief air and development workers, education deans and others.
​
See our other summaries: on
  • Influences & Influencers
  • Actors/Employees
  • Mediators of Change
  • System Elements 
  • Steps in Systems Change
that are part of our Coherence Model  for Systems Change
  • Joint Statement
  • Global Educator Organizations
    • AASA (SD Admin)
    • ASCD & ISTE (senior ldrs)
    • CASSA (SD Admin)
    • Education Support & Cultural Workers
    • ISNA (International School Nurses Association)
    • IAC (Counselors)
    • ICP (Principals)
    • ISPA (Psychologists)
    • GNDE (Deans of Ed)
  • Endorse Statement, Edit Paper & More
  • Summaries on Transforming School & Other Systems
    • Apply/Nominate Writers of summary
    • Influencers
    • Actors & Employees
    • Contextual Mediators
    • System Elements
    • Steps & Processes in Systems Change
  • Organizations & Individuals Supporting Statement
  • UN / Global Initiatives on Transforming Schools
  • Blog: Ed News & Activities on Systems Transformation
  • Webinars
  • Contact